Rabbi’s Blog | Adath Israel

Rabbi's Blog

Rosh Hashanah day 2 – Faith is never to be 100% sure

Every year, by now, I can count on at least three people coming to me to talk about their discomfort with being “a bad Jew”. Or maybe they’ll soften their self-judgment, and say “you know rabbi, I’m not a good Jew”. Or maybe “not as good as the other Jews”. And then a list of “I know I should’s” will follow, usually dealing with mitzvot or with faith in God. Or both – because rabbi, how can I do anything if I don’t believe in God?

So this morning I want to remind us – myself included – that hsving faith is not the same as having certainty.

We live in a world that features preachers selling that being faithful is being certain. You just have to believe! they say. We receive messages that faith is like a possession, either we have it or not, like a coin in our pocket or a diploma on our wall. Belief becomes a set of convictions – and many think that having or not these beliefs makes the “good Jew”.

But what if this idea fundamentally misses the mark? What if faith is not about having the right answers? What if faith is about embracing the mystery, living with questions?

Our very name as a people points to this different idea of faith. Israel means “one who wrestles with God.” This is not “one who submits to God” or “one who never questions God,” but one who wrestles. When our patriarch Jacob encounters the angel at the Yabbok River and gets this new name, Israel, Jacob wrestles with the angel until he is blessed. Jacob does not sit there, in passive acceptance and expectation of blessing. Jacob struggles, fights, engages.

The Talmud preserves for us the great debates between our sages and their many students. These weren’t academic exercises — they were acts of faith. The sages understood that wrestling with difficult questions, finding ever more gray areas between what looks like black and white, even about fundamental matters, was itself a form of worship. Why are we here? What happens after we die? Why were human beings created? Was God right in even creating humans? The Talmud is not a book of answers, but 5,422 pages of mostly questions and debates, proofs, disproofs and new questions.

And this is not new to Jews – it is not from Talmudic times. It figures in the Bible itself. Let’s take the Book of Job for instance. It is a difficult book to read, in part because it is the most honest exploration of faith in the Bible. God in that book is portrayed as an impossible mystery – but Job, who suffers and questions, doesn’t lose his faith when he asks where is God’s justice – his faith deepens through the wrestling.

It is Job’s friends, the ones who offer him neat, easy, simple and simplistic explanations, they are the ones who miss the point. Job’s friends become, in the Rabbis’ reading, the example of what not to do when someone you know is suffering. Do not ever, say the rabbis, imitate Job’s friends with their simple answers and self-aggrandizing judgment. Those among us who, like Job, lost sons, daughters, grandchildren, or have seen them become seriously sick, or have gone or are going through serious illnesses or losses yourselves – we all know that silence is better than platitudes, a visit, a hug, a nice conversation are all better than unsatisfying and even insulting answers.

Faith, Job teaches us, is not about having God figured out, but about remaining in relationship even when God seems absent or incomprehensible. And – spoil alert – all that God offers to Job at the end of the book is relationship. Not answers.

The Hebrew word emunah, usually translated as faith, comes from the root meaning “to be strong, enduring, offer support” – it has the same root as amen, a word we sing quite a lot during the High Holy Days. This is not an intellectual assent to a philosophical idea. It is a type of relationship, a way of standing in the world. When we say amen, we’re not saying “I believe this statement is factually correct.” We’re saying “I align myself with this, I make myself steady with this truth.”

Abraham and Sarah, our spiritual ancestors, are called to leave everything familiar — lech lecha, go forth — toward a destination they cannot see, for a promise they cannot fully understand. This faith is not in a creed but a response to a calling. It’s not certainty about the future, but trust enough to take the next step. In that sense, everyone who has fallen in love and has seen it through years of marriage knows: marriage, to continue through thick and thin, requires faith, some days just enough faith in the relationship to take the next day as it comes. Because when life throws you lemons, any lemonade tastes sweeter when it is made together. Faith in one another means we take the next step together, and the next one and so forth – even if I cannot understand you all the time.

Moses, too, does not encounter God through a set of ideas but through a calling for a relationship — Moses stops to see a burning bush and hears a call. And even Moses struggles with doubt: “What if the children of Israel don’t believe me?” he asks. “What if they don’t listen?” God doesn’t offer him better arguments, not certainty that they will listen. God only offers him the promise of presence: “I will be with you.”

By confusing faith with certainty, we make faith fragile. If faith depends on never having doubts, then the first real question threatens everything.

When people embrace the idea that having faith is being certain, that does not encourage questions, growth or understanding. It does not let us see any value in the struggle. And then… life inevitably brings challenges. And challenges bring questions. And that simple, 100% certainty, is necessarily lost.

Another problem with certainty being passed off as faith is that this makes faith arrogant and cruel. Arrogant certainty closes us off from growth, from listening, from learning. An arrogant person does not learn, because they know it all. And this attitude closes us from the possibility that God might be larger than our understanding. The person who claims to be certain about God’s will in every situation has made themselves, not God, the final authority.

An arrogant faith is also cruel. History shows us repeatedly what happens when religious certainty becomes absolute. The Inquisition burned people at the stake with complete confidence that they were doing the will of God. The Crusaders slaughtered entire communities while singing hymns, certain they were doing what God wanted. In our own time, we’ve watched hijackers crash planes into buildings, suicide bombers target civilians, extremists commit massacres — all while claiming absolute certainty that God is approving their actions. This kind of faith is dangerous because when we confuse our human, limited understanding with God’s unlimited truth, when we mistake our anger for God’s justice, this certainty becomes a weapon rather than a path to holiness.

The common thread in religious violence is not faith but the arrogant certainty that wants to eliminate doubt, close off questions, force others into the behaviors and absolute readings that the proponents of this type of faith deem approppriate.

Piety becomes power – and then God Godself is out of the picture, God’s name is merely used for power moves. There is no relationship with God in this case.

The Shema, our most central prayer, does not begin with “Believe that…” but with “Hear, O Israel.” It calls us to attention, to listening, to presence. The commandment is not to have certain beliefs about God’s unity, but to listen to the call, to have a relationship with this unity, to live embeded in the unity of it all, to act consciously as a part of one interconnected whole, to treat every human as being created in the image of God, to respect nature as part of this unity.

This is the kind of belief that transforms us: not intellectual assent to doctrines, but existential trust that enables action aligned with life. This is the kind of belief that brings us to embrace questions, to embrace humility that maybe we don’t know everything – and maybe we will never will.

Our tradition has always understood this wisdom. We don’t have one systematic theology in Judaism the way other traditions do, because we’ve always been more interested in how to live than in what to think. Judaism, said Abraham Joshua Heschel, does not ask for a leap of faith. It asks for a leap of action.

Jewish practice has never demanded that we first achieve perfect belief before we begin doing. The word mitzvah is also our teacher in our understanding of faith.

Mitzvah is usually translated into English as commandment. That translation implies a vertical alignment with a commander. But the earliest translation of this word is actually to Aramaic, by the Targum Onkelos. And that translation is tzavta, which  actually means connection.

Mitzvot then are not understood as orders, but as actions that make for connections, for relationships.

Those of us who come to morning minyan – a little shout out here to our beloved minyanaires, in person and on Zoom – those who come feel not only a relationship with God, but also with each other. Because those who struggle together with God cannot help but creating a meaningful community.

Does it mean each of us understands every single word? That does not happen even in English! No, it means that some truths can only be known through living them, not through thinking about them. It is very good to understand what you are saying, let me be clear. But davening every day is not a Hebrew Language crash course. It is walking together with a community.

 

Those of us who we keep Shabbat in some form, we don’t do so because we’ve figured out exactly how blessing candles and wine, eating challah, having deep conversations creates holiness. We keep Shabbat as an act of trust — trust that there’s wisdom in this ancient rhythm, trust that we need regular reminders of what truly matters, trust in the connection it brings with Jews who have lit Shabbat lights for thousands of years, trust that stepping back from our constant doing, our contant screens, our constant dispersion of attention actually helps us remember who we are beyond our opinions and our work.

Those of us who observe kashrut do not claim to understand the spiritual mechanics of dietary laws. We’re engaging in a practice that makes us mindful of our consumption, that connects us to generations of Jewish families, a daily group of reminders that we are part of a covenant community.

The mezuzah on our doorposts is also a daily reminder of connection, a physical prayer, a way of marking our threshold between the ordinary world and the sacred space of Jewish living. Each time we touch it, we’re performing an act of faith—not faith in our understanding, but faith in the practice itself.

This is what the rabbis meant when they taught that mitzvot don’t require kavanah — we don’t need perfect intention or complete understanding to begin acting. We can start with the deed itself, trusting that meaning will emerge through practice. We light Shabbat candles even when we’re struggling with doubt, because bringing light to our homes in a conscious way can kindle something within us that mere thinking cannot reach.

This understanding of faith becomes especially crucial in times of suffering and confusion.

When tragedy strikes, when this broken world seems senseless, when God seems absent — these are times when faith is most purely itself.

After the Holocaust, theologian Emil Fackenheim spoke of a “commanding voice from Auschwitz” that created a new mitzvah, mitzvah number 614 – the prohibition to give Hitler a posthumous victory by abandoning Judaism. This wasn’t based on certainty that he could explain how God allowed the Holocaust. It was based on faith as stubbornness, faith as loyalty, faith as the refusal to let evil have the final word.

Elie Wiesel, similarly, never claimed to have answers. But he continued to ask questions, to tell stories, to insist on the importance of memory and witness. His faith was not in easy explanations but in the obligation to remain human even after witnessing the depths of inhumanity.

So another way of understanding faith is that it is as a form of courage — the courage to live as if our lives have meaning even when we cannot prove it, the courage to act with kindness even when the world seems cruel, the courage to hope even in the face of evidence to the contrary.

This kind of faith doesn’t require us to pretend we have no doubts. Instead, it asks us to act faithfully despite our doubts. This is emunah. It doesn’t demand that we never question God; it invites us to question God from within relationship rather than from outside it.

The rabbis taught us something profound about this mystery when they said, “God is the place of the universe, but the universe is not the place of God”. I am going to say this again, because it is a difficult concept: God is the place of the universe, the universe is not the place of God.

This teaching captures something essential about the nature of divine reality that defies our usual categories.

We typically say that God is “up there” or “out there”, in heaven or some such. Some place, somewhere, contained within the universe like we are. With this idea, the rabbis are asking a profound question: How do you locate that which is the very possibility of location? How do you contain that which is the container of all things? The rabbis want to challenge us: God isn’t located within creation; rather, all of creation exists within God. God is the where everything else unfolds, the context that makes all existence possible. When you ask “where is God?” it is like asking, “Where is everywhere?” The question itself reveals the limitation of our thinking.

The Hasidic master Kotzker Rebbe said, “Where is God? Wherever you let God in.” Perhaps, building on the rabbinic insight, we might say: God is already the place where we are — the question is whether we’re awake to it. Faith is not about proving God’s existence but about recognizing the sacred context in which our lives unfold. It’s not about having God figured out but about letting ourselves be held by the mystery that is always already embracing us.

All these teachings invite us into a different kind of faith — not faith that we can pin God down to particular places or explanations, not a faith that defines God in absolute terms, not a faith that believes it can manipulate God, but rather a faith that embraces our being within the ultimate mystery.

What does this mean for how we live? It means we can embrace both rigorous intellectual honesty and deep spiritual commitment. We can ask hard questions about our tradition while remaining committed to its values and practices. We can acknowledge the mystery at the heart of existence while still choosing to live meaningful lives through mitzvot. It means we can be humble about our understanding while being passionate about our commitments. We can say “I don’t know” about many things while still saying “I choose” about how we live.

It means we can hold space for others’ questions without feeling threatened, because our faith isn’t built on having all the answers. We can welcome seekers and doubters, knowing that struggling with faith is often deeper than simply accepting it.

Faith, understood this way, is not a destination but a journey, not a possession but a relationship, not a certainty but a commitment. It’s the willingness to say, with Jacob, “I will not let you go unless you bless me”—to wrestle with the ultimate questions not because we expect easy answers, but because the wrestling itself transforms us.

In a world that often demands simple answers to complex questions, our tradition offers something different: the wisdom to live fully within the mystery, to act with purpose in the middle of uncertainty, to choose love even when we cannot fully explain why love matters. This is emunah — not certainty, but faithfulness. Not the end of the journey, but the strength to continue walking.

May we have a year in which we have the courage to live our questions, and the faith to continue wrestling with the divine until we are blessed.

Shanah tovah

 

Rosh Hashanah Day 1 – You are Superman

Shanah tovah! Welcome to Rosh Hashanah, our Jewish New Year. I’m grateful for this opportunity to share thoughts from our tradition with you tonight, and I thank you for being here as we begin this holy time together.

Our services are made possible by many minds, hands and hearts: Cantor Re’ut Ben Ze’ev, our volunteer prayer leaders and shofar blowers, Leah Adler and all of the ritual committee, the board, Joanna Schnurman, Julio Ramos and Honor Edmands. Each has played a fundamental role in bringing us together yesterday, today, tomorrow and the High Holy Days ahead.

This is a wonderful beginning of the season of transformation, our Yamim Nora’im, our High Holy days.

Transformation, the recreation of the self, is what our tradition invites us to these days. We take leave from the world to embrace the possibility of transformation.

Now, I was seven and a half years old when I witnessed my first and most amazing moment of transformation – and that was… Clark Kent becoming Superman. As we had moved to Argentina, and settled in a tiny sleepy little town of 2,000 families, Pergamino, my parents decided to treat us, children, to an amazing experience – and took us to the movies. Superman was playing on the local cinema. The fact that he spoke English, and you had to read Spanish fast to catch up to the story, made no difference. I was smitten with the man of steel.

I mean, who wouldn’t? A completey good guy, someone who can fly faster than a speeding bullet, who is more powerful than a locomotive, and who, in a single bound, can leap tall buildings, can go backward in time, fix all problems and defeat evil. And to top it all, incredibly handsome. Blue, earnest eyes, and black waivy hair.

So it should come with no surprise that Mark and I, along something like 60 million other people worldwide, took our kids to see the new Superman movie this year. And as I revisited this powerful first example of transformation, I of course I hit the books, I learned something amazing: the man of steel was actually forged in the shtetl.

We all know Clark Kent is Superman, but I learned that both Clark Kent and Superman are Jewish. Books like “Up, Up, and Oy Vey” and “Is Superman Circumcised?” tell us a story that is actually hiding in plain sight:

In 1938, two Jewish kids from Cleveland, Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster, lived the immigrant story. Their families had fled Eastern Europe in the great Jewish migration of the late 1800s, and they understood what it meant to change your name, blend in, and yet never forget where you came from, who you were, which are your values. They made that story into a character: they called him Superman.

Siegel and Shuster imbued that creation with a deep, hidden identity. Consider the core elements of Superman’s story: his given name, Kal-El, is Hebrew for “voice of God” or “swift is God.” El is the ending of many names for angels in our tradition, that became regular names used by Jews and non-Jews alike: Michael, Rafael, Gabriel. Kal means swift, and Kol, which can be written as kal, depending on how you transliterate, means voice. Kal-El. What a Jewish name.

Now Superman, as a baby, was sent away from a dying world to survive. That world was a grand world, but is no more, there is no expectation of ever getting it back. There is no return to that past. Superman was destined to grow up hiding his true identity, he is raised by two good people who love him deeply, know he is a wonder, gifted, and yet do not understand him completely. Those adoptive parents have to be hidden themselves from the bad guys.

And his story is even more complex than that. Superman has a secret. He lives his everyday life as Clark Kent, the mild-mannered reporter of the Daily Planet in the city of Metropolis. Clark is quiet, a bit of a klutz, a little incompetent and clueless, and wears glasses. This the opposite of his heroic self. This duality — the public, assimilated persona of Clark Kent and the private, powerful, and truly unique identity of Superman — is a powerful metaphor for the Jewish American experience.

For many of us, our lives are a balance between these two worlds. We live as Clark Kent, fully integrated into American society, speaking its language, understanding its culture, and fitting in seamlessly.

Yet, within us lies a powerful, ancient, and divine identity — the Superman within. The question for us today is not which identity is real, but how we can embrace both. And all the other identities that happen inside the life of a person in America in the 21st century.

Nearly a century ago, Rabbi Mordechai Kaplan talked about Jews living in two civilizations – two identities. Kaplan meant that a Jewish American person could maintain kashrut while embracing democratic values, celebrate both Sukkot and Thanksgiving as meaningful cultural moments, and draw from both traditions to create a rich, authentic life.

This framework back then liberated many of us from the false choice between assimilation and isolation. We were happy to be both 100% Jewish and 100% American. That rung true and powerful in 1920s, when he was writing.

Nowadays, however, we know that there are multiple identities for any person, and certainly any Jewish person. The binary does not work anymore – we have Jews that are Black, Asian, Latino, LGBTQ+, say nothing of the political expressions that are used as identities these days.

Our tradition speaks to these many identities in different ways – living in the Diaspora and its tensions with Jewishness is as old as the Bible itself. Consider a beloved Jewish holiday, Purim. The story is in the Book of Esther, the redemption from Haman is celebrated every year at Adath Israel, with reading the megillah and our Purim carnival. The entire story of Purim revolves around a hidden identity – and antisemitism.

Esther, a Jewish woman, becomes queen in the court of the Persian king, Ahashverosh. At the urging of Mordechai, her uncle for all purposes, she keeps her Jewish identity a secret. She is a perfect Clark Kent, blending in so completely that no one suspects her true origins. But when her people are threatened by Haman, Mordechai delivers a message that forces her to confront her true self: “Who knows if for such a time as this you have attained royalty?” (Esther 4:14).

Esther realizes that her identity is not a weakness to be hidden, but the very tool of her salvation. She sheds her Clark Kent persona, reveals her Jewishness to the king, and ultimately saves her people. For many of us, there comes a moment when our Jewish identity is called upon, not just for our own sake, but for a greater good. It is in those moments that our hidden strength is revealed.

Take the true story of Shai Davidai. He was a professor at Columbia University, and in his own words not very public about his Jewish and Israeli identity until October 7th.

As an Assistant Professor in the Management Division of Columbia Business School, his research examined people’s everyday judgments of themselves, other people, and society. A very universal theme. I first heard him speak on a podcast called Israel Story, which features “wartime diaries”, by Mishi Harman. There, Shai Davidai explains that prior to October 7th 2023 his Jewish identity was important but never “out there”. Shai even looks a little like Clark Kent. As a good professor, he wears glasses. In the army, he served as a medic for the Navy. He self-defines as a left winger in Israel, usually critical of the government. Living in Israel, he explains, makes your Jewishness paradoxically less intentional – it is like water for a fish. In America, he and his wife found out, for the first time, that to remain Jewish you have to be intentional about being Jewish. So they spoke Hebrew at home. They read the Israeli equivalent of PJ Library to their kids. They made time to observe some of  holidays. They talked about values.

But the atmosphere he witnessed on college campuses (and specifically at Columbia), compelled him to speak up and speak out against Hamas. And let me tell you that on Twitter, on October 6th 2023, he had 900 followers, most people who are self-proclaimed nerds of universities, professors, talking about research in economics. But once a video of him speaking off the cuff, about his experiences on October 7th, and the experiences of his family in Israel, and what was happening on the campus, all that changed.

By March 31, 2024, he had 30,000 followers. Nowadays he has almost 108,000. Having found his identity and his voice, he also lost his job at Columbia University. He has a podcast, entitled Here I am. Hineini. This is a powerful Jewish sentence.

It was on that podcast, Here I am with Shai Davidai, that I heard the story of Debra Messing. Having been born in Brooklyn, but moving next to a farm in Rhode Island, Debra Messing had many encounters with antisemites. She was called names in second grade, her grandfather’s car was vandalized with a swastika and she was taunted by the other kids when she observed Yom Kippur. So she hid. She began lying to other children, telling them she was sick every time she had to stay home for a Jewish holiday. “I had decided I am just going to hide,” she explained. “I’m going to hide my identity. I’m gonna try and just blend in because that’s the safest way.”

Sounds like a great Clark Kent to me.

But for college she went to Brandeis University. That shook her awake, because the school is, I am quoting her here, “Jew U.”

She explained that not only they “had off for Yom Kippur, but everyone talked about Shabbat and all of the sudden I felt seen. And I over the years became proud and decided that I wasn’t going to hide anymore and that I was going to embrace my heritage, and be loud and proud.” Debra Messing has emerged as a prominent voice against antisemitism in recent years, as a side to her activism regarding marginalized communities seeking equity and inclusion. She also chose to say Hineini, here I am.

And this sentence, here I am – Hineini,  is a powerful Jewish sentence. Abraham is the first human to use it, as the Torah reading of today has told us: here I am. I am present at this moment – unapologetically Jewish. Now all of us can see the Superman behind the glasses. The Clark Kent persona was no longer.

None of them: Esther, Shai Davidai, Debra Messing, Superman are hiding their strength – they are all showing their essence, their soul.

This brings us to a second Jewish source for this morning, the very essence of Jewish existence. The Zohar speaks of the Neshamah, the soul, and the Guf, the body.

The body is the external vessel, the public-facing part of us that interacts with the world. But the Neshamah is the inner, divine spark, our true, spiritual self. Our soul. It is this hidden essence that connects us to God and to our tradition.

Our Clark Kent self is the Guf, navigating the complexities of the modern world in diaspora, in America of the 21st century. Our Superman identity is our Neshamah, the part of us that remembers our covenant, our history, and our sacred obligations. It never forgets. It remembers its deep devotion to Life, with capital L.

In that, we are no different than our ancestors in other great Jewish Diasporas, like Spain in the early middle ages, like Poland in the 13th century with the statute of Kalisz, when Jews were so accepted and integrated in the general community that they had to be intentional about their Jewish identity and practices.

The Jewish challenge has always been to ensure that the Guf never completely overshadows the Neshamah, but rather serves as its protective shield, a way to move through the world while keeping our deepest identity intact, coming out when needed to connect with the Transcendent, to defend Jewish peoplehood.

The thing is, we are different. We straddle two worlds: the world of religion and the world of peoplehood.

When a convert comes in, they are not signing up just for a set of beliefs and actions, they are signing up for a collective destiny: in Nazi Germany, for instance, a convert, even if they were 100% Aryan, had the same end as a born Jew.

But our Jewish identity cannot be constructed just by antisemitism. We can’t be Jewish just because others hate us. Ours is a tradition in which the main life-long intellectual exercise is to know enough to have a dialogue with the tradition. A few of my non-Jewish friends express surprise when they learn how alive and full of opinions Jewish Law really is, how diverse. This is because Christians come from a tradition, particularly if they are Catholics, that prizes agreement with tenets, and a collective path of decision making – in the Catholic tradition the Pope is the presence of God in the world.

But not us. The Shechinah, God’s presence, according to the rabbis, resides whenever one, two, three, ten people are studying and debating together. God’s presence is inside every Jewish soul, lovingly beconing us to be our best selves, using our traditions and our mitzvot as a vehicle to survive in the world.

And Jewish peoplehood gives us a lesson too.

Look at our history, look at the history of the Jewish people. Time and again, we have been a people who were seemingly scattered, weak, and without a homeland, yet we have defied all expectations. We are a miracle in time: the Assyrians, the Babylonians, the Egyptians, the Romans –  not one of those remain, their cultural influence makes up bits and pieces of the Western culture, but they are not here.

We, on the other hand, can say – hineini, in Hebrew, here I am. Or Ich bin doh, in Yiddish – here I am. Or that phrase in any of the several other Jewish languages in the world, like ladino, judeo-arabic, judeo-Malayalam….

We, my friends, we are the ultimate Superman, a people that has survived against all odds, creating a powerful spiritual and intellectual tradition that has shaped our presence in the world through Torah, mitzvot and community.

This strength did not come from our public persona, did not come from our Clark Kent, but from our hidden resilience, our Superman, our emunah our faith, about which I will be speaking about tomorrow – I know, shameless plug – and from our unwavering commitment to our identity and the right of being us. The right and the beauty of being different.

Ours is a strength that is so profound, it often takes an outside observer to see it. It is the kind of strength that shows up in moments of great crisis, but it has been building inside us all along, being nurtured by our commitment to our values, ideals and texts.

Let us learn from Superman’s duality. Our Jewish identity is not something to be forgotten or compartmentalized. It is our greatest strength, our moral compass, and our source of resilience. We can be Clark Kent, fully present in the world, and we can be Superman, powered by the strength of our Neshamot, our souls.

The challenge, and the opportunity, is to let our Superman self—the one who draws from thousands of years of tradition, from the Torah, from our sacred texts, and from our collective soul—guide our actions as Clark Kent. As a reminder, you all received a seal of Superman – remember who you are.

So here is to a year in which we all have the strength to live as both Clark and Superman, finding the right moment to reveal our true selves for the good of our people and all of humanity. May we finding the strength to do so, and the courage to learn so as to be a meaningful part of our people. Le Shanah Tovah tikatevu. May we all be inscribed in the book of a life well lived.

Matot-Masei: Holiness, Hatred and us

This week’s reading is the longest in Torah – it is the combination of Matot and Masei. The two readings together, which happens almost every year, have 253 verses and it is the longest reading of the Torah. The longest portion is Naso, with 176 verses, followed by Pinchas, with 168 verses. But Matot and Masei, which are very frequently combined, have together 253 verses.

The portion of Matot begins with Moshe explaining the laws of vows and oaths, including how they can be annulled. It then details the Israelites’ war against Midian, outlining the laws regarding the spoils of war. Finally, it addresses the request of Reuben and Gad to settle outside of the Promised Land, a request that Moses initially rejects but ultimately grants under specific conditions.

The portion of Masei summarizes the Israelites’ journey through the wilderness, delineates the borders of the Promised Land, and outlines the laws regarding cities of refuge and inheritance for women. It also details the Israelites’ 42 stations in the wilderness, from Egypt to the plains of Moab.

Love and Limits: Photo by Lera Ginzburg on Unsplash

==

In the middle of Matot, there is a troubling command: God tells Moshe: “Avenge the Jewish people against the Midianites – and after that you will be gathered to your people.”

What the Midianites did to the Jewish people in the desert is described in the previous portions, at the end of parashat Balak and the beginning of parashat Pinchas. It was a sexual trap to get the Israelites to worship a deity called Ba’al Pe’or. A plague followed, as a punishment to the people. This plague was the greatest death in the 40 years in the desert, surpassing even the Golden Calf. This plague had 24,000 people dead, and is only stopped by the equally troubling actions of Pinchas.

The idea that our ethics and morals extend to our sexual behavior is present in the Ten Commandments, for instance, with “do not commit adultery” and on Yom Kippur afternoon reading. Kedushah, holiness, is defined by elevating the physical, and guarding it with limitations: the idea being that God created a physical world and us, physical beings, elevate that to the realm of a day-to-day spirituality.

We create holy days, like Shabbat, by refraining from certain actions, and not working. We create holy relationships, with our parents and partners, by honoring them – and some of that honor is expressed by not doing certain actions, like deception, cheating, cursing. Maimonides will add to the concept of holiness also the idea that we elevate food: both the laws regarding what animals we eat or not, and the death we cause to animals by making sure that they are killed in the quickest way – both of those ideas he inserts in the part of “laws of holiness” in Maimonides’ code. How we refrain our impulses regarding food is holiness too. To be a holy people, we elevate the mundane,and sexual behavior is part of that. Judaism is about finding ways of elevating our daily life towards holiness – we are called a holy people. The Midianites, the story in the Torah tells us, entrapped the Jews precisely through making them believe that there are no limits for sexual behavior.

The text continues, however, by telling Moshe that as soon as this war is done, he, Moshe, will die. The people of Israel at this point are poised to go into the promised land, and we know that all the leadership of the desert would not get into the land. Moshe is the last of the three siblings: Miriam and Aharon have died. And the text has said that as soon as this battle is waged, he will die. A normal person will understandably balk at such a command, and try to postpone it. But Moshe is giving us a lesson in leadership – he immediately gets the people ready for this war. He knows that he has to give up on his life so that the people can move forward in their story.

Great leaders are those who put the needs of those whom they lead before their own needs. Moshe is not just giving up leadership, and letting Joshua take over, but he is also giving his very existence so the people can go into the land. It is rare, nowadays, to find that type of leader, the leader that will put the collective well being above his or he personal desires, his or her personal interests, his or her political interests.

I have told this story a couple of times, so let me tell it to you too. As a freshly minted rabbi, I went to what can be describe as a job fair for rabbis. Conservative synagogues looking for new rabbis and fresh off the school rabbis meet, have interviews and from there, if the interviews are good, the rabbi goes to visit communities and see if they would be a good fit. I interviewed with several of communities, and got to visit four of them, one on each following weekend.

There was a community looking for an assistant rabbi. The pay was excellent, they had a nice house for the assistant rabbi, and the community seemed nice. So I was not the only new rabbi trying for that assistant position, and visiting it. And suddenly, before any of us received a yes or no, the congregation closed that position without giving an explanation. The explanation came on the papers next day: the senior rabbi had stolen 100,000 dollars from the congregation for his own personal use. And what was the use? To bring his mistress over from another state! I’ll let that sink in for a moent. The rabbi, of course, lost his license to be a rabbi, went to jail for a few years and then became an used car salesman. I do not have to tell you how traumatic that experience was for the community itself, how they had to pick up the pieces afterward, how long and difficult the healing process was.

Whenever leaders put their own personal interests above the needs of the community, in our people, tragedy ensues. This Shabbat we begin what is called the nine days, which is the period between Rosh Chodesh Av and Tishah beAv, the nineth day of the month of Av, when we remember the destruction of the Temple. That destruction happened for many reasons, say the rabbis. One of them is the infighting between the leaders – every single group during the second temple period had a position that can be described as “my way or the highway”. Every individual that was significant, even if they were not a leader, had their own desires front and center, not caring about the needs of the nation, the people, or even Jerusalem. Not caring about limits. This is called ‘sinat hinam’, translated as ‘senseless hatred’, the most famous of those stories is Kamtsa and Bar Kamtsa.

Senseless hatred is an odd concept, if you think about it. When you listen to people who hate, they all think that they are being very sensible. They all have logical reasons to hate and to put their own actions forward with complete disregard for the other, with complete disregard for the consequences to their families, communities and people. They all have logical reasons to want to have no barriers towards their objectives. It is my way or the highway. So I don’t think that senseless hatred is a good translation of ‘sinat hinam’. A better translation is ‘hatred freely given, without regard for consequences’.

Whenever we give in to hate, there are consequences. When we decide that we have a pass on hateful actions because the ends justify the means, that is sinat hinam. When we somehow rationalize our hate driven actions, after all we are only looking for our own interests, that is sinat hinam, hate given freely without thinking of the consequences. The names in the story, Kamtsa and Bar Kamtsa, can be translated as Locust and Locust Junior.  Now think about the destruction locusts bring – and yet each locust is doing precisely only their own interest: to eat as much as possible in the shortest amount of time, they only focus on their selves. They destroy everything, there’s nothing left for the next generation. The hatred between Locust and Locust Jr destroyed the temple, say the rabbis – because it was just each looking for his own interests, and disregarding the collective.

Holiness, our portion reminds us, is to be searched throughout our lives, in every moment, in every action. This means regarding the other, listening to them, accepting limits, understanding and taking in consideration the needs of those we share our lives with, the needs of our friends and families, the needs of our communities, cities, people and nation. The needs of the collective, as Moshe exemplifies to us. Sinat hinam, consequence-free hatred, is the complete opposite of that.

So may we take to heart these lessons, may we see the needs of others and take them in consideration, and may we, after the Nineth of av, find the true consolation of Ahavah hinam, Love that is given freely. Shabbat shalom.

Naso – the power of one

Summary: “Naso,” means “Count” // it is the longest portion in verses // Completing the headcount in the desert. We read the laws of sotah, who is the woman suspected of adultery by her husband; the laws of Nazir, the person who decides to abstain of grape products, cutting hair and attending to dead bodies; the blessing of the kohanim: yevarechecha hashem. The 12 tribe leaders, princes, called nesi’im in our portion, bring gifts to the Tabernacle. All gifts are the same but they are repeatedly described by the text.

==

There was once a Hasidic disciple of the Toldot Aharon (Aharon the rebbe of the Karlin dynasty) who decide he need to elevate his soul even more. He was a young man deeply devoted to his spiritual growth but felt that it was not enough just to be a devoted hasid. He took a Nazirite vow. He stopped cutting his hair, stopped touching or consuming any grape products, and distanced himself from any source of spiritual impurity.  You might think this is easy, but have you noticed how much grape products we consume, at every holiday and every Shabbat? Even challahs can have raisins. So he refrained from staying for kiddush, did havdalah by himself, and was never there if the lechayims included wine, which was common at the Karlin court. He also stopped going to cemeteries and visiting shiva houses.

His life became one of solitary holiness, with prayer, Torah study, and deep introspection being the core of his routine. After some time, he began to feel disconnected from the world around him. One day, he asked to see the Rebbe and explained his situation, feeling that his path was at a crossroads: Must his spiritual connection with God be at odds with people? The Rebbe of Karlin listened patiently and said:

“You have made yourself pure, but in doing so, you have distanced yourself from the community. Holiness is not only a solitary endeavor. That is easy. The real challenge is to use holiness to transform both yourself and the world around you. True holiness shines through when you bring light to others.”

The young man was puzzled. He asked, “But Rebbe, how can I bring light to others when I am separated from the world?”

The Rebbe responded: “This is the teaching of the Nazir. While the Nazir refrains from certain pleasures, she or he is still part of a greater community. The sanctity of the nazir is not for the individual alone — it is to serve as a model for others, a conduit of blessing. If you truly wish to elevate yourself, you must learn to blend your inner purity with the needs of the community.”

A short while later, the Hasid found himself in a position where he was called upon to serve as a part of the kohanim, giving the blessing during Rosh Hashanah.

That year, the hasidim told the rebbe: what an amazing moment! Each and every one of those present, men and women, felt an overwhelming sense of peace, and some even reported feeling a tangible presence of divine energy in the air. The moment of Birkat Kohanim was unlike any they had experienced before! The very heaven seemed to have opened in the shul. Many felt impelled to review their deeds and be kinder to those around them.

The rebbe then called the young nazir, and told him: now it is time for you to see that you can actually raise holiness among people. Look what happened: when you raised your hands they became channels for a deep spiritual power – because you were able to help others with the energy of devotion, restraint and self-discipline.

The young man then embraced the end of his Nazir vow, as he understood that holiness is not about retreating from the world, but about bringing God’s presence into the world, sharing blessings with others.

 

==

What seems to be the pinaccle of these gifts?

Why is the last verse in our reading important, and what do you think it teaches us?

Behar-Bechukotai – siblinghood and circles of obligation

Behar-Behukotai

Summary: Behar and Bechukotai come very frequently together. In a 19 year cycle, they are read together 12 times. Behar (“On The Mountain”) details the laws of the sabbatical year (Shemita), when working the land is prohibited and debts are forgiven. It also sets out laws of indentured servitude and of the Jubilee year (Yovel), when property reverts to its original ownership. Bechukotai (“In My Laws”) is the final Torah portion in the Book of Leviticus. It begins describing blessings that follow obedience to God’s laws and curses that come with desecration of them. It ends with laws of vows and consecration of people and property.

==

In the parsha of Bereshit, God poses two questions that end up being fundamental for our existence – Ayeka – where are you? and Ey Hevel achicha – where is your brother Abel?

We know that siblinghood is fraught with problems in the entire book of Bereshit. Kayin and Hevel are the first ones, but it does not get a whole lot better as we move through the story. Ishmael is banned to give space to Itzchak, whom he might have tried to kill, according to some commentators. Esau threatens to kill Yaakov, who has definitely pulled the wool over his eyes, as only brothers can do to one another. Rachel and Leah have a relationship defined by competition. The sons of Yaakov pretend their brother Yosef is dead.

Really, the only two siblings that get more or less along are Aharon and Moshe, and even then their relationship is not easy.

When you have that in mind, it is quite jarring to read the Hebrew of our portion, and not see the word achicha, your brother, jumping out, almost screaming. In the whole of Leviticus, “your brother” will appear 8 times, five in our reading. If you add achiv, “his brother”, as in “he will redeem his brother” that will appear 9 times in the entire book of Leviticus, but 5 of those will be in our reading. If you have been keeping count, of the 17 times brother appears in the book, ten of those times are in our reading. So the idea of siblinghood, at this end of the book, is really important.

In part, it is because we are reading the laws of the Yovel, the Jubilee year. And our reading depicts a person falling progressively into poverty, first selling their land, then living with relatives and finally selling themselves as slaves, either to other Jews or to non-Jews. At all points, that person’s siblings are supposed to come and help, to redeem the land and the person. And then an interesting shift happens, which is as the slave is free with the Yovel, the Jubilee year, they are supposed to, and I quote “return to their family”. The text has slid an expansion of the term “brother” – the brother is not whom you share a bloddline with, but the brother, the sibling, is really just another person that is part of our people. The obligation for caring for them is expanded as if they were siblings.

We easily see and feel that we have deeper relationships with those in our family, that those with whom we share a personal history have a claim on us, and us on them. The idea that if a sibling has fallen into poverty and we should help them is easily accepted, as it is the first circle of obligation. But the text wants more: the text wants us to accept the obligation as the circle expands to all the persons in our people. You could, and probably should, that the web of obligation is stronger among the members of one’s family, and weaker among the members of one’s people. But the text is very clear: do not imagine it does not exist. There is an obligation to the other, those who are not your family.

But do we stop there? Just on our people? The Torah, having told us the stories of all the siblings in Genesis, is actually asking us to see a little deeper and a little more expansive. Remember, the second question that God asks a human being is “where is your brother?”

We all, at a certain point, quoted the answer “I don’t know! Am I my brother’s keeper?” because we intinctively know that yes, we are the ones taking care of our siblings, just as they are taking care of us. But let us remember that Kayin is not just the universal figure for the first homicide and fratricide. He is the universal figure of not caring.

The Torah can really be seen as the response to that question. In Deuteronomy, for instance, there is no such a thing as “the poor” as a separate entity than “us” (chapter 15). Every time the poor are mentioned, they are mentioned as your sibling somewhere. The text in Deuteronomy goes so far to remind us that “you are all children of your God” (14:1).

But we, my friends, we do not live in Torah times, we live in the 21st century. Our understanding of our interconnectedness has grown, and we all have seen the idea that we can always be connected to anyone in the world with 6 steps. This is one of the beauties of social media – we learn that we are, indeed, connected to all.

In the Talmud, in Baba Metzia, we read that our circles of obligation begin in our family, but they never stop there. In Sotah we learn that we support the non-Jewish poor together with the Jewish poor, the sick Jews along with the sick non-Jews, the Jewish and the non-Jewish deceased are all to be taken care for together.

We, Jews, are called to care. Not just about our family, not just about our people, not just about our town, not just about our state, not just about our country. We are called by the text to care. For all. Not equally, but care for all.

It is only by answering God’s second question: where is your brother? with a significant answer, and not the flippant answer of Kayin, that truly, we can then know the answer to the first of God’s questions: where are you?

May this week we be able to answer “hineini”, here I am, to both of those questions.

Shabbat Shalom

==

Shabbat morning:

~ What things can be made sanctified, ie, consacrated, specified for use in the Temple, according to our reading? What are the exceptions?

~ What is the power of saying that something is for the use of the Temple?

Kedoshim – to be holy we need other people

“Acharei Mot,” means “after the death of”

“Kedoshim,” means “holy”

Following the deaths of Nadav and Avihu, God warns against unauthorized entry “into the holy” – this is a place, inside the tabernacle in our story and later, inside the Temple, where incense is offered. Only one person, the kohen gadol may, once a year, on Yom Kippur, enter the innermost chamber in the Sanctuary to offer the incense. The rest of the reading is the description of Yom Kippur in the Tabernacle, with the two goats, and we read that on Yom Kippur morning.

The Parshah of Kedoshim begins with the statement: “You shall be holy, for I, Ad-nai your God, am holy.” This is followed by many mitzvot through which a Jewish person enters in this holy relationship with God. Kedoshim is famous because of one line: “Love your neighbor…”

==

Recently I learned with R. Jeni Friedman that philosophical and ethical concepts can be either thin or thick, depending on how we use them.

One example is “good”. When we say “oh, he’s such a good person” – this is a thin concept, because there is no real description behind this “good”. It is very different if I say “he’s courageous”, because courage is a thicker, more define, concept than just “good”. If I say “he’s good, he’s generous with his time” I am providing you with a thickening of this general, undefined “good”.

Holiness, I think, works the same way as “good”. We don’t think about what being holy means, as we are pretty far away from the times when the Torah was written and feel even farther away from God.

Reading the text of Kedoshim, that begins with “you shall be holy because I, Ad-nai your God am Holy”, we have a progressively thickening of this concept. Firstly, there is not being holy only internally, without an action that brings about holiness in the external world. This is the first and most important piece: a person needs to act. Holiness is not a given, holiness is not a inherent quality of anyone, and cannot be achieve without effort. The parsha, which is fairly short, has 51 mitzvot, which is a fair amount in the total number of mitzvot.

The mitzvot described in our portion are either acts between us and God, or between us and other people. We, moderns, would imagine that if the Torah is talking about holiness it will inevitably focus on what we call ritual actions, but that is not so. The very first action in the list offered by Kedoshim is to revere parents – the rabbis will expand this to any parental figure you had in your life, not just a mother and a father. So shout out to the mothers and mother figures out there! Now, we all agree I believe that we would say that this is a mitzvah that is between people. You can’t revere your parents or parental figure if you are alone in an island.

Many mitzvot that are found in the Torah need us to be in contact with others to actualize those mitzvot.

And yet, in the same line, in the same sentence that we read about revering parents, we read that we are supposed to keep Shabbat. Now that one, we all agree, can be done without someone around: it can be actualized alone in a remote island. It is with those two mitzvot that this section telling us how to be holy opens: you need both mitzvot with God and mitzvot with people for this project.

And yet, if you go around counting and separating the mitzvot only on those two categories, you have 32 mitzvot between people and 19 between us and God. The clear weight of holiness is as we act with each other. Holiness, in Judaism, cannot be achieved alone: every person you meet is a portal for you to find the path of holiness. To be holy is a path of the everyday, it is not a path for the saintly person living alone at the top of the mountain.

By not lying, by refraining from gossip, by having honest weights and measures, by treating the stranger as you would treat yourself, because, says the text, you know how oppressed a stranger is, given that you were strangers in Egypt. By giving tzedakah to the poor, by supporting those who have less than you, by paying your workers on time, by not embarassing anyone. All those are examples from our text, all those are moments when we progressively become holy.

The crowning glory of Kedoshim is “love your neighbor as yourself”. Very famous sentence, repeated everywhere. Less famous is what the rabbis will do with it: love your neighbor – act lovingly towards those around you, whether in your home or in the market. Because for Judaism, love cannot be just a feeling, it is not enough for it to be inside, love has to come outside, out of the closet of our hearts, in all its glory to the outside, to the other.

The same happens with holiness: we have to act towards the other in holiness, and then we will achieve this level. It is Maimonides who will insist that we have to pay an enormous attention to what we do because, he says, we become what we habitually do. To be holy, says the Torah, we need people around us. We need community. We need to engage with one another. We need to give to others, without expecting to be repaid. Holiness, for such a lofty concept, is actually in our hands.

Shabbat Shalom.

==

Shabbat morning:

Look at the mitzvot we will be reading as part of the holiness code. Besides positive and negative, how else can you divide them?

[Between people and people, between God and people, between people and the land (orla), between people and themselves (cutting skin for the dead)

Pekudei and our contributions

Pekudei –

Summary: “Pekudei,” means “Accountings of”. This is what the Parsha deals with: an accounting is made of the gold, silver and copper donated by the people for the making of the Mishkan. Betzalel, Oholiav and their assistants make the eight priestly garments—the apron, breastplate, cloak, crown, hat, tunic, sash and breeches—according to the specifications communicated to Moshe before, in Tetzaveh.

The Mishkan is completed and all its components are brought to Moshe, who make it stand and anoints it with the anointing oil, markign that every single piece is now holy. Moshe initiates Aharon and his four sons into the priesthood. A cloud appears over the Mishkan, signifying the Divine Presence that has come to dwell within it.

==

In a small village, far from the great centers of Torah learning of Poland, lived a simple Jew named Shmuel. He was neither a scholar nor a wealthy man—just a carpenter, he made his living by building houses. His hands were rough from years of labor, and his back hurt from carrying wood. He never felt the center of anything, and always thought of himself as a background figure.

Shmuel often thought of the Mishkan, the holy sanctuary built in the wilderness. He loved listening to the Torah portions detailing the construction. He marveled at how each material—gold, silver, wood, wool—was carefully accounted for, and how every craftsman, from the most skilled to the simplest, had a role in its creation.

One day, news spread that the great Rebbe of Mezhibuzh, the Baal Shem Tov, was visiting a nearby town. Though the journey was long, Shmuel felt an irresistible pull to go. “Perhaps,” he thought, “I will hear a teaching that will lift my soul.”

Upon arriving, Shmuel found the Rebbe surrounded by scholars and wealthy patrons, all seeking his wisdom. Shmuel stood quietly at the back of the crowd, listening intently but feeling small. What could a simple carpenter like him contribute to such a gathering?

The Baal Shem Tov suddenly looked up, his piercing eyes scanning the crowd. “Tell me, my friends” he called out, “is there a carpenter among us?”

The people turned, surprised, when Shmuel hesitantly stepped forward. “I am a carpenter, Rebbe.”

The Baal Shem Tov smiled. “Tell me, beautiful soul, when you begin preparing boards for building  a house, do you ever find a board that seems crooked or unfit for use?”

Shmuel nodded. “Yes, Rebbe. But I do not discard it right away. Sometimes, I find that it fits perfectly in a place I did not expect.”

The Rebbe’s face lit up. “Aha! And so it is with us. In the great structure of creation, some souls seem crooked, unworthy, or unimportant. But Hashem, the Master Builder, does not cast them away. Instead, God knows exactly where they belong.”

A hush fell over the crowd. The great scholars, the wealthy patrons—all of them suddenly understood that just as the Mishkan needed all the willing participants to be there, even those who seemed small and unnecessary, in the world too, very person has a place, even those who feel unworthy.

Tears welled in Shmuel’s eyes. He had always felt like an unnoticed worker in the background, but now he saw the truth: in Hashem’s divine accounting, no one is extra, no one is wasted. Every person, every effort, is counted.

As he left, his step was lighter, his heart full. He would return to his work with new strength, knowing that in the great building of Hashem’s world, his hands—and his soul—mattered.

That night, he had a dream: the Mishkan stood in front of him. But it was not the mishkan of the Torah text. An angel explained to him: “Shmuel, what you see is the spiritual reality of the Mishkan, the mishkan above. Every good deed, every pure thought, every time you hold back from speaking ill, every tear you shed in prayer — all these are pieces that come together in this Mishkan, the one that all the souls of the Jewish people help build, in this reality above. And Shmuel, there is one piece missing… and it is yours to place.”

From that time on, Shmuel never again saw himself as small. He understood that in Hashem’s divine accounting, every action of every person who yearns for for God’s presence is a fundamental piece in the spiritual reality of the Jewish people.

 

 

==

Shacharit

~ When was the Mishkan completed? When is that this year?

~ What is Moshe’s reaction when all is said and done? Why, in your opinion? What does he do?

~ Can you find connections between the mishkan and the story of creation, back in genesis?

Bo – come to pharaoh

 

Summary: Bo means “come”, as in “come to Pharaoh”, even though the translation will say ‘go to Pharaoh’. And this is God commanding Moshe to talk to Pharaoh after the announcement that God has, indeed, hardened Pharaoh’s heart. We read the last three plagues: locusts, darkness and the plague of the firstborn. We read the very first collective mitzvah – establishing a calendar. We read the first passover of all times, with the lamb and the blood on the mezuzot. Passover specifics are given: not bread, no leaven for seven days, eat matzah, tell your children. The commandment of tefilin is also given.

==

KS

The Kotzker Rebbe, Menachem Mendel Morgensztern of Kotzk lived from 1787 to 1859 in Poland wants to tell us an important point regarding our portion. He starts with, “Bo el Paro,” come to Pharaoh. Notice, he says, that the Torah does not say lekh, as in like Lekh Lekha to Abraham and Sarah. It could. And actually, good Hebrew would say it should read “lekh el Par’o, go to Pharaoh. But it doesn’t the Text says Bo, “come” to Pharaoh. The Kotzker will say that there is a reason for that, that the reason is that one cannot go from the Blessed Holy One – it is impossible to distance one’s self from God, because God exists in every makom or in English, “place,” in every place.

Every piece of reality we experience, the good, the bad, the ugly – there is God there too.

The Kotzker rebbe quotes Isaiah, which is a famous sentence if you come to shul on the morning: “Melo kol ha-aretz kevodo –  The whole earth is full of God’s kavod.” – that is, glory, majesty, honor. The Kotzker continues: “Therefore God says here, ‘come’, as if to say, ‘Come with me.’ Hineni it’cha, Behold, I am here with you wherever you go.”  Meaning, as the Talmudic rabbis say, the universe is not the place of God, God is the place of the universe. God is not a deity with limited location and powers, God is not a him, God is not a her either, God just is. Maimonides will say something to the effect that God is the background or ground of all meaning, of all reality. God is the touchstone of all morality and ethics. In other words, that God is not “a god,” but that God is the word our ancestors used to mean that reality that we need to acknowledge before we can do anything meaningful.

The Kotzker is saying is that Moshe needs to change his own paradigm about God. Moshe – and us, of course – need to stop thinking that God is going to take him by the hand and go somewhere with him, and fix all things. Moshe needs to understand that God, in the way that God wants to be known, is already with him and in fact also with Pharaoh, and that the responsibility is now entirely on Moshe to understand that truth and to do what needs to be done.

Another famous story of the Kotzker is him asking his bewildered students, “Where does God dwell? Where does God exist?” They say, “Well you taught us that Rebbe. You taught us that God is everywhere. The whole earth is full of God’s glory.” And the Kotzker answers “Not exactly – God is wherever we let God in.” In other words, there’s no place or person or thing or animal in whom God is not – there is no place in the world that is void of God’s presence.  But we, we can be void of the awareness of that reality, we can feel that God is not there because we do not acknowledge that reality.

In a way, the Kotzker is trying to disabuse us of a childishly idea of God, that of a superman (or superwoman) or that of a big daddy (or mommy) that will make it all better. It is fine to have that idea when you are a kid, but once you have some more years and experiences under your belt, that theology is a recipe for disaster. The notion that the Kotzker is advancing here is that God is the reality who is already here with you, and will be with you even in the frightening moments of your life  – in Moshe’s life, the moment of confronting a Pharaoh who has a hardened heart. In your life, think of whatever was the most frightening time you had – and God was there with you too, and God will be there with you. The only thing left for you to do is also the most fundamental: acknowledge and understand that reality.

So may this be a week of embracing this mystery: God is. In all of our experiences, God is, was and will be. Shabbat shalom.

==

What are the mitzvot mentioned in our reading this morning? What are the connections that you can find between them?

[matzah, pessach, telling the story, sacrificing firstborn, tefilin] All hearken back to knowing we were slaves.

Vayechi – Living while dead, dead while living

Summary: “Vayechi,” means “And he lived” – just as we had with Chayey Sarah, which means the life of Sarah but actually talks about her death, here too we will begin with Vayechi Yaakov – Yaakov lived, but we are actually seeing Yaakov’s last moments.

Yaakov will take the transformation of death haed on: he first make Yosef, or Joseph, swear that his body will be taken to be buried in the Cave of Machpelah; and then in a second scene he blesses Yosef’s children, Efrayim and Menashe. The third scene of his passing is where our triennial picks up: at the end of his blessings for each of his children. We read the blessing for Biniamin and an explanation for the request of being buried in the Cave of Machpelah. We will read the Egyptian rites for Yaakov and the Jewish ones. The portion will end with Yosef again assuring his brothers of his complete forgiveness, his death and making the descendants of Yaakov promise they would take his bones back to the land of Israel when possible.

==

KS

There was once a man who lived a comfortable life in a quiet village. He had three close companions whom he loved dearly, each played an important role in his life.

One day, a royal messenger arrived at his home with startling news: “The king has summoned you to his court. Prepare yourself, for you must give an account of your life.”

The man grew anxious. “I have never been to the palace,” he thought. “I need support. I must ask my friends to accompany me.”

He turned to his first friend, the one he loved most. He said to the friend: “the king has summoned me. Will you come with me to the palace?”

The friend answered: “Are you kidding? I will stay in your house. Don’t you know what is written? “Riches profit not in the day of wrath” (Prov. 11:4).

The man felt a pang of sorrow. He then turned the second friend, whom he loved but paid less attention in life than the first friend and asked: “the king has summoned me. Will you accompany me and speak on my behalf?”

The second friend was a little better than the first, but not by much. He said: “I will come with you to the gates of the palace, but we cannot go beyond the gates. At the king’s court, you you are on your on. Don’t you know what’s written: “None can by any means redeem their brother” “For the redemption of their soul is priceless” (Ps. 49:7-8).

The man’s heart grew heavy. Finally, he turned to his third friend, which he had often neglected in the busyness of life. Hesitantly, he approached him. “My faithful friend,” he said, “I have not always tended to you as I should. But the king has summoned me and I am afraid. Will you come with me?”

The third friend, glowing with quiet strength, replied, “I have been with you all along, though you may not have noticed. Wherever you go, I will go. At the king’s court, I will even speak for you. Don’t you know what’s written? “Your righteousness shall go before you, the glory of Hashem will be your reward” (Isa. 58:8)

The man felt a deep sense of peace.

The first friend, his possessions, only help a person in this world. Even before burial, they are gone. The second friend, which are a person’s family and friends, can only help to escort a person to burial. Then they must take leave. But our good deeds, even though they are not always appreciated and even though they are the ones we least pay attention to, they are the true loyal friend. With their assurance, the man prepared for his journey to the palace, as we all do.

(Based on Pirkei deRabbi Eliezer, 34:8, on Ps 49:5)

Supporting sources

אָמַר לֵיהּ רִבִּי חִייָא רוּבָּא כְּדוֹן אִינּוּן מֵימָר לְמָחָר אִינּוּן גַבָּן וְאִינּוּן מְעִיקִין לָן. אָמַר לֵיהּ וְחַכְמִין אִינּוּן כְּלוּם לָא כֵן כְּתִב וְהַמֵּתִים אֵינָם יוֹדְעִים מְאוּמָה. אָמַר לֵיהּ לִקְרוֹת אַתְּ יוֹדֵעַ. לִדְרוֹשׁ אֵין אַתְּ יוֹדֵעַ. כִּי הַחַיִּים יוֹדְעִים שֶׁיָּמוּתוּ אֵלּוּ הַצַּדִּיקִים שֶׁאֲפִילוּ בְמִיתָתָן קְרוּיִין חַיִּים. וְהַמֵּתִים אֵינָם יוֹדְעִים מְאוּמָה אֵלּוּ הָֽרְשָׁעִים שֶׁאֲפִילוּ בְחַיֵּיהֶן קְרוּיִין מֵתִים. מְנַיִין שֶׁהָֽרְשָׁעִים אֲפִילוּ בְחַיֵּיהֶן קְרוּיִין מֵתִים שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר כִּי לֹא אֶחְפּוֹץ בְּמוֹת הַמֵּת. וְכִי הַמֵּת מֵת. אֶלָּא אֵילּוּ הָֽרְשָׁעִים שֶׁאֲפִילוּ בְחַיֵּיהֶן קְרוּיִין מֵתִים. וּמְנַיִין שֶׁהַצַּדִּיקִים אֲפִילוּ בְמִיתָתָן קְרוּיִין חַיִּים. דִּכְתִיב וַיֹּאמֶר אֵלָיו זֹאת הָאָרֶץ אֲשֶׁר נִשְׁבַעְתִּי לְאַבְרָהָם לְיִצְחָק וּלְיַעֲקֹב לֵאמֹר. מַה תַלְמוּד לוֹמַר לֵאמֹר. אָמַר לוֹ לֵךְ וֶאֱמוֹר לָאָבוֹת כָּל־מַה שֶׁהִתְנֵיתִי לָכֶם עָשִׂיתִי לִבְנֵיכֶם אַחֲרֵיכֶם.

(Proverbs.9.5) “The living know that they will die”, these are the just people, who even in death are considered living; “but the dead do not know anything;” these are the wicked people, who even in life are called dead. From where that the wicked even in life are called dead? It is said (Ezekiel.18.32) “For I have no pleasure in the death of the dead;” how can a dead person die? But these are the wicked who even in life are called dead. And from where that the Just even in death are considered living? It is written (Deuteronomy.34.4) “And He said to him: This is the land I had sworn to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, to tell.” Why does the verse say “to tell”? He said to him: go and tell the patriarchs that all I had promised I fulfilled to your descendants after you. Jerusalem Talmud, Brachot 2:3

 

״וְהַמֵּתִים אֵינָם יוֹדְעִים מְאוּמָה״ — אֵלּוּ רְשָׁעִים, שֶׁבְּחַיֵּיהֶן קְרוּיִין ״מֵתִים״, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר: ״וְאַתָּה חָלָל רָשָׁע נְשִׂיא יִשְׂרָאֵל״. וְאִי בָּעֵית אֵימָא, מֵהָכָא: ״עַל פִּי שְׁנַיִם עֵדִים אוֹ עַל פִּי שְׁלֹשָׁה עֵדִים יוּמַת הַמֵּת״, חַי הוּא! אֶלָּא, הַמֵּת מֵעִיקָּרָא.

In contrast to the righteous, who are referred to as living even after their death, the verse states explicitly: “The dead know nothing.” These are the wicked, who even during their lives are called dead, as the prophet Ezekiel said in reference to a king of Israel who was alive: “And you are a slain, wicked prince of Israel” (Ezekiel 21:30). And if you wish, say instead that the proof is from here: “At the mouth of two witnesses or three witnesses the dead shall be put to death” (Deuteronomy 17:6). This is puzzling. As long as the accused has not been sentenced to death, he is alive. Rather, this person who is wicked is considered dead from the outset. Brachot 18b

 

 

==

Morning – questions for discussion

~ Look at the burial practices of Egypt and of the Hebrews, both in our reading.

~ What is surprising? What can you tell about the pressures Yosef is under?

~ What do you make of the exchange between Yosef and Pharaoh?

Vayetze – a soul’s journey

Our parsha opens with Yaakov going towards his destiny, so unsure that, after the dream-revelation of the ladder, he makes a pact with God – with words that will raise eyebrows throughout the centuries. “If God is with me… and watches me as I go… and gives me food and clothing… and if I return home… then I will make this pillar a house for God and I’ll give God 10%.” And Yaakov is not the only one dreaming in this portion, but Lavan dreams as well, a dream that prevents Lavan from attacking Yaakov as he, after 20 years, decides to head home with his wives, children and flocks.

Free Torah Pocket Watch photo and pictureThe place, we know, will become called Mahanayim, literally, camps, as Yaakov will realize that he has grown incredibly much since 20 years ago, when he crossed that very same place only with his staff, and had uttered those words.

It is Rabbi Sacks, z”l, that says that “Where what you want to do meets what needs to be done, that is where God wants you to be.” Yaakov seems to live those words, and really embodies the inheritance he struggled so much to receive.

Now, we would be doing ourselves a disservice if we look at Yaakov’s story as just that – a story about a person. It is also a symbol about what happens within us: Yaakov’s struggle to find balance is our own struggle.

Yaakov is pulled and pushed between forces that are beyond his control.

First, between being truthful and deception – finding ways to wiggle out of difficult positions with massaging, at best, words – and sometimes being outright deceitful. And sometimes being caught himself in lies by other characters, having a taste of his own medicine, learnig the importance of truth.

Second, between his mother and his father, between being inside the tents, protected and sheltered; and being outside, running for his life, going to an unknown place with unknown people, his only companion his shepherd’s staff.

Third, Yaakov is pulled between Avraham and Yitzchak – having learned expansion and compassion with Avraham, and limitation and constriction with Yitzchak.

Forth, between two strong women who are his wives, two strong impulses – the beautiful Rachel, whom he desires and loves, being pulled down to earth by her; and the soulful Leah, whose only striking feature are her eyes, a symbol of the soul in all cultures, pulling him to spirituality and the life of the soul.

And note that all this happens to Yaakov before his struggle with the angel, before the meeting with Esav, before the cycle of Yosef. Yaakov, as we see him in this portion, has no idea that after finding balance in what looks like a tremendous amount of struggle, there is a lot more in store for him: the confrontation with Esav, the rape of Dina and the matter of Shechem, and the sale of Yosef.

Everything we read about Yaakov so far, all those people, all the incidents, all the manipulations are symbols for the pulls and pushes inside our own souls. All those are forces that we are trying to deal with, searching for the ways we can become more refined through our lives in this world.

It is in that sense that the Zohar will understand that Yaakov is connected to the sefira of Tif’eret, of balance and beauty. A beautiful life is a life that finds balance through all its struggles, that keeps going trying to uncover its meaning even after what looks like meaning is found.

May we be inspired, this week, to embrace our soulful growth through our struggles.

Shabbat shalom.